American Mineral RegistryResearch & data

State law reference

Do Mineral Rights Expire in Idaho?

Do mineral rights expire in Idaho? No Idaho statute was found that ends or transfers a severed mineral interest for nonuse, requires a statement of claim, or provides a procedure for missing mineral owners. Unpaid mineral proceeds can become unclaimed property under Title 14 chapter 5, which affects the payments, not ownership of the interest.

  • Release 2026.10.1
  • Reviewed October 1, 2026
  • CC BY 4.0

No statute found Researched and checked by American Mineral Registry by searching the text it could read, which turned up no statute on this point; review completed October 1, 2026. Reference research, not legal advice.

Rule type
No such statute found
Period
None
Ends without a surface owner step
Not applicable
Preservation filing
Not applicable
Forced pooling statute
Statute found
Core rule cited
Surface damages statute
Statute found
Core rule cited
Deceased or unlocated owner
Partly checked
Do Mineral Rights Expire in Idaho?: map of the 51 U.S. jurisdictions with Idaho marked and the 17 others that share its rule type, no such statute found shaded
Idaho is one of 18 jurisdictions that had no statute of these kinds in AMR’s search of the official code. Every jurisdiction’s rule type is on Mineral Rights by State.

How the rule works

No dormant mineral statute identified. No Idaho statute was found that ends or transfers a severed mineral interest for nonuse, requires a statement of claim, or provides a procedure for missing mineral owners. Unpaid mineral proceeds can become unclaimed property under Title 14 chapter 5, which affects the payments, not ownership of the interest. Mining claim location and relocation rules in Title 47 chapter 6 are a separate topic.

Scope

Interests covered
Not applicable.
Minerals covered
Not applicable.
Enactment and amendments
No dormancy statute identified in the archived official chapter texts (snapshots 2025-03 to 2026-03).
What AMR searched
Official Idaho Statutes at legislature.idaho.gov (host was not available when AMR checked; read from Internet Archive snapshots of the official pages). Full text of official chapter PDFs searched for mineral, severed, dormant, marketable, abandon, unknown owner, surface owner, statement of claim, lapse and oil and gas: Title 55 (Property in General) chapters 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8; Title 47 (Mines and Mining) chapters 3, 6, 7 and 8; Title 6 chapter 4 (quiet title); Title 5 chapter 2 (limitations); Title 14 chapter 5 (Revised Unclaimed Property Act). Snapshots dated March 12, 2025 to March 9, 2026. Chapter lists of Titles 55 and 47 read (snapshots May 10, 2026 and June 12, 2026). No dormant mineral, statement of claim, marketable title or missing mineral owner statute found. Related: Title 14 chapter 5 treats unpaid mineral proceeds as unclaimed property; Title 47 chapter 6 governs location of mining claims (including relocation of abandoned claims, 47-607); 55-101 and the foreign ownership provisions in chapter 1 mention mineral rights only in other contexts.

What “none found” means. AMR searched the official code for a dormant mineral, abandonment, lapse or forfeiture statute and found none. That does not mean a mineral interest can never be lost: deeds, title defects, tax sales, adverse possession and other rules can still affect ownership, and they are outside this review.

Dates and what they mean

There is no statutory nonuse period to calculate for this jurisdiction under the rules AMR reviewed.

No statutory lapse was identified, so there is no lapse or deadline date for Idaho.

Deceased or unlocated owner

Partly checked What the law of Idaho says when the owner of record has died, is unknown, or cannot be found. It sets out the questions; it does not decide who owns an interest, whether a notice was valid, or whether an interest ended.

Why only partly checked. Amendments after the archived copies were not checked, and no order or decision on heirs of a deceased owner was read.

Idaho has no dormant mineral statute, so no rule ends an interest because its owner is dead, unknown or missing. Its integration procedure does address such owners: an applicant must try twice over 60 days, once by certified mail to the last known address, and must publish notice in a county newspaper for owners who are unknown or cannot be found, while known and located owners receive the application by certified mail. An owner who makes no election is paid at least a one eighth royalty and the highest bonus paid in the unit, and unpaid mineral proceeds fall under the unclaimed property act; neither transfers title.

Owner of record has died
Not addressed in the provisions read. The integration provisions speak of owners who are unknown or cannot be found and do not mention death, heirs or devisees.
Current owner unknown
Integration applicants must publish notice for owners who are unknown (P2, P3); commission hearing notice is by publication where the interested person is unknown (P5). Unknown and cannot be found owners are treated alike.
Owner known but cannot be found
Integration applicants must attempt certified mail to the last known address (P1) and publish for owners who cannot be found or located (P2, P3, P4); the department is asked to post notice on its website (P4).

How the nonuse rule treats these owners Not addressed in the provisions read

No dormancy or nonuse mechanism exists in the provisions read, so none treats deceased, unknown or unlocated owners.

Heirs, devisees and successors Not addressed in the provisions read

No provision read addresses heirs, devisees or who counts as the owner when the owner of record has died. Probate, heirship, quiet title, partition and receivership procedures of general application may apply and were not reviewed.

Search required to find the owner Statute

For integration, two good faith contact efforts over at least 60 days, one by certified mail to the last known address, documented in a resume of efforts.

Statute

  1. An integration applicant must document good faith efforts on at least two occasions over at least 60 days to reach uncommitted owners, with at least one contact by certified mail to the owner's last known address. Idaho Code 47-320(4)(j) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 7, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-006.

    “A resume of efforts documenting the applicant’s good faith efforts on at least two (2) separate occasions within a period of time no less than sixty (60) days to inform uncommitted owners ... At least one (1) contact must be by certified U.S. mail sent to an owner’s last known address.”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership.

Who gets notice, and how Statute

For integration, certified mail of the application to all known and located uncommitted owners within seven days of filing; for commission complaint hearings, certified mail or service as for a summons.

Statute

  1. The applicant sends the application to all known and located uncommitted owners and must publish notice of the application, hearing and response deadline for owners who cannot be located. Idaho Code 47-328(3)(b) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot June 18, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-008.

    “the applicant shall send a copy of the application and supporting documents to all known and located uncommitted mineral interest owners ... For any uncommitted owners and working interest owners who cannot be located, an applicant shall publish notice of any application for an order, notice of hearing and response deadline once in a newspaper of general circulation”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership.

  2. For hearings on complaints, notice to an interested person who is unknown or cannot be located is served by at least one county newspaper publication. Idaho Code 47-328(2) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot June 18, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-009.

    “Where the interested person is unknown or cannot be located, the commission shall serve notice by publishing at least one (1) notice of the hearing to such person in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the affected tract is located.”

    Scope: Complaint proceedings before the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission under 47-328(2).

Notice by publication Statute

Publication is required for owners who are unknown or cannot be found or located: a legal notice before applying, a published notice of the application certified at filing, and a notice of hearing and response deadline.

Statute

  1. If an owner is unknown or cannot be found, the applicant must publish a legal notice in a county newspaper asking the owner to make contact. Idaho Code 47-320(4)(j) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 7, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-006.

    “If an owner is unknown or cannot be found, the applicant must publish a legal notice of its intention to develop and request that the owner contact the applicant in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the proposed spacing unit is located.”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership. Treats unknown and cannot be found owners the same.

  2. On filing, the applicant certifies that notice of the application was published for uncommitted owners who are unknown or cannot be found, including the response opportunity and deadline. Idaho Code 47-320(5) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 7, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-007.

    “At the time the integration application is filed with the department, the applicant shall certify that, for uncommitted owners who are unknown or cannot be found, a notice of the application was published in a newspaper in the county where the proposed spacing unit is located.”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership.

  3. The applicant sends the application to all known and located uncommitted owners and must publish notice of the application, hearing and response deadline for owners who cannot be located. Idaho Code 47-328(3)(b) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot June 18, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-008.

    “the applicant shall send a copy of the application and supporting documents to all known and located uncommitted mineral interest owners ... For any uncommitted owners and working interest owners who cannot be located, an applicant shall publish notice of any application for an order, notice of hearing and response deadline once in a newspaper of general circulation”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership.

  4. For hearings on complaints, notice to an interested person who is unknown or cannot be located is served by at least one county newspaper publication. Idaho Code 47-328(2) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot June 18, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-009.

    “Where the interested person is unknown or cannot be located, the commission shall serve notice by publishing at least one (1) notice of the hearing to such person in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the affected tract is located.”

    Scope: Complaint proceedings before the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission under 47-328(2).

How the owner responds or preserves Statute

Uncommitted owners may object at least 14 days before the hearing; an owner who makes no election receives the statutory base entitlement.

Statute

  1. Only an uncommitted owner in the unit may object, and must file at least 14 days before the hearing date in the notice. Idaho Code 47-328(3)(b) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot June 18, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-008.

    “Only an uncommitted owner in the affected unit may file an objection or other response to the application, and the uncommitted owner shall file at least fourteen (14) days before the hearing date provided in the notice.”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership.

  2. An owner who makes no election within the order's election period is compensated by the operator on the statutory terms that follow. Idaho Code 47-320(3)(c) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 7, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-010.

    “If an owner fails to make an election within the election period set forth in the integration order, the operator shall compensate such owner for the owner’s share of production with the following just and reasonable terms”

    Scope: Integration (forced pooling) applications to the Idaho Department of Lands under Idaho Code 47-320 and 47-328; applies to uncommitted owners in a proposed spacing unit, not to a lapse of ownership. Applies to any non electing owner, which would include an owner who never received notice; the text does not single out unknown owners. Terms in (c)(i) to (vi).

Court, receivership or trust for missing owners Statute

No receivership, trust or escrow for unknown owners' minerals was found. The integration notice rules above apply to unknown and unlocated owners, and the Revised Unclaimed Property Act covers unpaid mineral proceeds.

Statute

  1. Idaho's unclaimed property act defines mineral proceeds as amounts payable for extraction, production or sale of minerals. Idaho Code 14-5-102(16) Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Read October 6, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 17, 2025. Source ID SRC-ID-011.

    “"Mineral proceeds" means an amount payable for extraction, production, or sale of minerals or, on the abandonment of the amount, an amount that becomes payable after abandonment.”

    Scope: Revised Unclaimed Property Act (added 2024). Payments only, not ownership; presumption periods were not read.

What a title review must establish

  1. Is the interest in an integrated spacing unit, and did the order treat the owner as non electing under 47-320(3)(c) (response)?
  2. Did the applicant's resume of efforts and publication certificate cover the owner of record or the heirs (search, publication)?
  3. Are royalties for the owner held as unclaimed property (special_mechanism)?

Dates. 47-320(4)(j): efforts 'on at least two (2) separate occasions within a period of time no less than sixty (60) days'. 47-328(3)(b): mailing 'within seven (7) days of filing the application'; department web notice requested 'within seven (7) days of filing'; objections 'at least fourteen (14) days before the hearing date'. 47-328(2): hearing notice 'at least five (5) business days before the date of the hearing'. Nothing computed. The rule finder does not calculate this period.

What AMR searched. legislature.idaho.gov was not available when AMR checked; read from Internet Archive snapshots of official pages: 47-320 (March 7, 2026), 47-328 (June 18, 2026), chapter 47-3 PDF (March 12, 2025) and chapter 14-5 PDF (March 17, 2025). Chapter 47-3 searched for unknown, cannot be found, cannot be located, escrow and unclaimed; 47-331 royalty payment section read. The October review's survey of Titles 55, 47, 6, 5 and 14 found no dormant mineral or missing mineral owner statute and was not repeated in full. No case law search, since no statute was found that a decision would interpret on these points. A point marked not addressed means only that the provisions read do not address it; probate, quiet title and other general procedures may still apply and were not reviewed.

Not settled by this review.

Whether integration orders entered after publication bind heirs of a deceased owner of record; no order or decision read.

Presumption period for mineral proceeds under the Revised Unclaimed Property Act.

Amendments after the snapshot dates (2025 and 2026 sessions) not checked.

Checked October 6, 2026. Also in the dormant mineral rule finder.

Forced pooling

Core rule cited In the absence of voluntary integration, the Idaho Department of Lands, on application of any owner in the proposed spacing unit, shall order integration of all tracts or interests in the unit (Idaho Code 47-320, numbered 47-322 before 2017). The application must include an affidavit that at least 67 percent of the mineral interest acres in the unit support it; nonconsenting working interest owners face a risk penalty of up to 300 percent, and owners who make no election receive at least a one eighth royalty and the highest bonus paid in the unit.

  1. Idaho Code § 47-320(1)Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Official statute. Read October 1, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 7, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-002.
  2. Idaho Code § 47-320(4)(h)Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Official statute. Read October 1, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 7, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-003.

Surface damages

Core rule cited Idaho Code 47-334 (added 2017, amended 2023) lets an oil and gas owner or operator use the surface as reasonably necessary but requires it to mitigate effects, minimize interference, and compensate the surface landowner for unreasonable crop loss, loss of value to existing improvements and permanent damage to the surface. Either side may request nonbinding mediation, and unless the surface owner is party to a lease, surface use agreement or waiver, the operator must post a surface use bond of at least 6,000 dollars per well site before the drilling permit is approved. Separately, 47-708 makes lessees of state mineral leases compensate surface owners.

  1. Idaho Code § 47-334(3)(c)Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Official statute. Read October 1, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 16, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-004.
  2. Idaho Code § 47-334(8)(b)Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Official statute. Read October 1, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshot March 16, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-005.

Taxes

Broad personal income tax: yes. Nonresidents owe Idaho tax on income attributable to the ownership of any interest in real or tangible personal property located in Idaho, and the 2025 instructions report rents and royalties in the Idaho column when received while a resident or related to Idaho business or property. Official text cited Source and notes.

Severance or production tax. Not part of AMR’s October 2026 tax review, which covered 25 producing states; that is not a finding that Idaho levies none. Use the state revenue agency’s own pages.

Not tax advice. Rates change and the cited source controls.

Sources for the dormant mineral rule

Each source was read on the date shown. Where an official site was not available, the official page was read through a dated Internet Archive copy and that is stated.

  1. Survey of Idaho Code Titles 55, 47, 6, 5 and 14 chapters (full text of chapter PDFs)Idaho Legislature, Idaho Statutes. Official statute. Read October 1, 2026, via Internet Archive snapshots March 12, 2025 to June 12, 2026. Source ID SRC-ID-001.
    “"Mineral proceeds" means an amount payable for”

Open questions for a specialist

This review did not settle these points. They are where an Idaho title attorney or landman should look first.

The official host could not be reached; all text came from archive snapshots dated up to March 2026 for the chapter texts, so 2026 session amendments were not checked.

Title 55 chapters other than 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 8, and other titles, were not searched in full text.

Idaho case law on abandonment or adverse possession of severed mineral interests was not reviewed.

Common questions

Can mineral rights lapse in Idaho?

A search of Idaho’s official code found no dormant mineral, lapse or forfeiture statute, so an interest does not lapse through nonuse under a statute of that kind. Deeds, tax sales and title rules can still affect ownership.

Does Idaho allow forced pooling?

Yes. Idaho has a forced pooling statute, summarized with its citation under Forced pooling above.

Does Idaho require payment for surface damage?

Yes. Idaho has a statute requiring operators to compensate surface owners, summarized with its citation under Surface damages above.

What changed

The June 2026 edition listed Idaho as Does not lapse, lapse period none. Release 2026.10 replaced that entry with the reviewed rule above, and retired the June risk score and ranking for every state. Release 2026.10.1 added the deceased or unlocated owner section. See all changes.

Cite this page

American Mineral Registry. "Do Mineral Rights Expire in Idaho?" U.S. Mineral Rights Law Atlas, release 2026.10.1, October 6, 2026. https://americanmineralregistry.com/research/states/do-mineral-rights-expire-in-idaho

General information about statutes, not legal advice and not a title opinion. Facts about a specific interest decide the outcome. Published by American Mineral Registry, which also runs a commercial service for owners; see how the two relate.